Re: ISSUE-37 WAS:Proposal for containers

On 31 Jan 2013, at 19:54, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> One argument against introducing ldp:contains or any such new predicate is that we want to encourage reuse and this doesn't. 
> I'm not really sure this is independent of ISSUE-37. As the draft stands it only supports composition and if that's all we end up with there won't be any confusion about what rdfs:member is about, will there?

My understanding is that the spec being silent on aggregation only means that it places no constraints on the way that users are able to create their own RDF aggregations.
Therefore, there is every chance that the existing composition model can be confused with user aggregation unless it introduces its own vocabulary as proposed.

Steve.