- From: Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:51:03 -0500
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <510995C7.3090603@oracle.com>
All the best, Ashok On 1/30/2013 1:56 PM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya wrote: > Hi Ashok, > > Thanks for the summary. It looks much clear this way. A small clarification on how to interpret the use of "member" in proposal. When you say members, do you mean the same as the membership property in the current specification ? Yes > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com <mailto:ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>> wrote: > > C. Thus, a contianer can contain a mix of members and comtainers. > (Some of the members may be links to LDPRs.) > > > Is this correct too ? - Thus, both LDPRs and containers can be members of a container ( some of the members may be links to LDPRs and some may be links to containers). Something like, > > @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>. > @prefix ldp: <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#>. > <http://example.org/container1> a ldp:Container; > rdfs:member </member1>, </subconatainer1>. Yes > Best Regards, > Nandana
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2013 21:51:35 UTC