Re: Proposal for containers

All the best, Ashok

On 1/30/2013 1:56 PM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya wrote:
> Hi Ashok,
>
> Thanks for the summary. It looks much clear this way. A small clarification on how to interpret the use of "member" in proposal. When you say members, do you mean the same as the membership property in the current specification ?
Yes
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com <mailto:ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>> wrote:
>
>     C. Thus, a contianer can contain a mix of members and comtainers.
>     (Some of the members may be links to LDPRs.)
>
>
> Is this correct too ? - Thus, both LDPRs and containers can be members of a container ( some of the members may be links to LDPRs and some may be links to containers).  Something like,
>
> @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>.
> @prefix ldp: <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#>.
> <http://example.org/container1> a ldp:Container;
>    rdfs:member </member1>, </subconatainer1>.
Yes
> Best Regards,
> Nandana