Re: Proposal for containers

Hi Ashok,

Thanks for the summary. It looks much clear this way. A small clarification
on how to interpret the use of "member" in proposal. When you say members,
do you mean the same as the membership property in the current
specification ?

On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Ashok Malhotra
<ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>wrote:
>
> C. Thus, a contianer can contain a mix of members and comtainers.
> (Some of the members may be links to LDPRs.)
>

Is this correct too ? - Thus, both LDPRs and containers can be members of a
container ( some of the members may be links to LDPRs and some may be links
to containers).  Something like,

@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>.
@prefix ldp: <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#>.
<http://example.org/container1> a ldp:Container;
   rdfs:member </member1>, </subconatainer1>.

Best Regards,
Nandana