- From: Steve Battle <steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:25:18 +0000
- To: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Ashok, I'm just seeking clarification here (no relevant issues are referenced in the subject line or body text). 1) Is this proposal about composition (the model), or aggregation? 2) Is a collection the same thing as a LDP container? Steve. On 29 Jan 2013, at 21:14, Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> wrote: > I think we are converging, so I'm writing this up as a proposal for collection > handling. > > 3. Can collections contain collections? > > A. Yes, collections contain collections > Collections are LDPRs and should > be added to collections like any other LDPR. > > B. To add a collection to a collections, POST a (child) collection > representation to a (parent) collection. > > C. Thus, a collection can contain a mix of members and collections. > Some of the members may be links to LDPRs > > D. If you GET all members of a > collection that is nested, you get all the contents, members and collections > at the top level. That is, you do not get nested members. > > E. If you delete a collection you delete everything it contains. For nested collections > this leads to a cascaded delete. > > F. If you do not want a member to be deleted when the collection is deleted, > do not include the member in the collection but rather include a link to the > member in the collection. > > I realize that E and F are controversial. If you disagree. Please indicate which > parts of the proposal you disagree with. > > -- > All the best, Ashok >
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2013 00:25:49 UTC