- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:11:28 +0100
- To: "Wilde, Erik" <Erik.Wilde@emc.com>
- Cc: "ashok.malhotra@oracle.com" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>, "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <07440AE8-240A-4615-9CDB-790B044EBB03@bblfish.net>
On 29 Jan 2013, at 15:42, "Wilde, Erik" <Erik.Wilde@emc.com> wrote: > hello henry. > > On 2013-01-29 10:03 , "Henry Story" <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: >> By sending a create-collection message (eg MKCOL ) to a collection that >> allows collection creation. If you follow the parents of such collection >> up you inevitably end up with a root collection: you can never do >> without >> a root collection. > > that's assuming that there is a homogeneous hierarchy. Which seems a very reasonable requirement on ldp:Container creation from inside an ldp:Container. > that's certainly > one way to do it, but you will find numerous systems out there where the > highest level is something different and something special, A root collection is special: it has no parents. You mean like soemthing completely different right? > because often it requires special privileges to be created, and also often questions of > authorization are associated with that highest level. Yes, that's my argument root collections have to be created in some other manner. > > AtomPub defers that question of creation to out-of-scope, but still has > such a concept, the workspace. a workspace just exists, and contains > collections. the model there was to have workspaces associated with what > in today's cloud parlance would be "tenants". Sounds like that is a completely different thing then from an ldp:Container, and that it does not in any way mean that ldp:Containers cannot create an ldp:Container. > >> If you reject the idea of a root collection then you end up >> with an infinite regress here. Because of whatever R you come up with as >> the >> thing that will create the root collection, you will be able to ask >> with equal justification of R how do you produce it. > > yes you can ask, but we as a group can say "that's out of scope and some > admin just does it." Indeed. That is why it makes me think of a root container. But it is something completely different. And so there is no reason why it should interfere with the ability to create ldp:Containers in ldp:Containers. > > cheers, > > dret. > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2013 15:12:01 UTC