- From: Wilde, Erik <Erik.Wilde@emc.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:40:49 -0500
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <nmihindu@fi.upm.es>
- CC: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
hello all. On 2013-01-25 12:33 , "Henry Story" <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: >Furthermore deleting a directory requires deleting all its members, and >deleting a member of an >directory deletes it from the directory listing, exactly the way >ldp:Containers are meant to work. as arnaud pointed out a while ago, in reality file systems are a bit more nuanced in their capabilities and interpretation than that. for example, depending on whether a directory contains had-links or soft-links, deletion semantics are different, and they even depend on the number of hard-links before a file is actually deleted. if we think that a file system analogy helps, then maybe we should at least use distributed file systems and their decentralized authority and control for our model. cheers, dret.
Received on Friday, 25 January 2013 14:43:48 UTC