W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Interaction model vs data model

From: Sergio Fernández <sergio.fernandez@salzburgresearch.at>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:12:53 +0100
Message-ID: <51013355.6010102@salzburgresearch.at>
To: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
CC: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Hi,

On 24/01/13 02:08, Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
> For what it's worth, section 5.2.1 of the LDP spec [2] states that "A
> Linked Data Platform Container must also be a conformant Linked Data
> Platform Resource." I've always read that as meaning that an LDPC is an
> LDPR.
>
> What am I missing?

Not sure if such simple interpretation could help in the discussion, but 
here my two cents: I'm not an expert in logic, but here we are mixing up 
subclass statements with behaviour comformant and method overloading. So 
I agree with Henry, this could be the source of the confusion defining 
both the data and interaction model. And we should define LDP using the 
right formalisms, probably not only DL.

Greetings,

-- 
Sergio Fernández
Salzburg Research
+43 662 2288 318
Jakob-Haringer Strasse 5/II
A-5020 Salzburg (Austria)
http://www.salzburgresearch.at
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2013 13:13:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:17:36 UTC