- From: Sergio Fernández <sergio.fernandez@salzburgresearch.at>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:12:53 +0100
- To: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- CC: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Hi, On 24/01/13 02:08, Arnaud Le Hors wrote: > For what it's worth, section 5.2.1 of the LDP spec [2] states that "A > Linked Data Platform Container must also be a conformant Linked Data > Platform Resource." I've always read that as meaning that an LDPC is an > LDPR. > > What am I missing? Not sure if such simple interpretation could help in the discussion, but here my two cents: I'm not an expert in logic, but here we are mixing up subclass statements with behaviour comformant and method overloading. So I agree with Henry, this could be the source of the confusion defining both the data and interaction model. And we should define LDP using the right formalisms, probably not only DL. Greetings, -- Sergio Fernández Salzburg Research +43 662 2288 318 Jakob-Haringer Strasse 5/II A-5020 Salzburg (Austria) http://www.salzburgresearch.at
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2013 13:13:45 UTC