- From: Cody Burleson <cody.burleson@base22.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:47:37 -0500
- To: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Received on Friday, 19 April 2013 18:48:24 UTC
I prefer Henry's proposal of using ldp:contains in addition to ldp:membershipPredicate or ldp:membershipPredicateInverse because it provides a clear mechanism for properly managing resources. Without that, how would I be able to distinguish between resources that a container actually owns and those which it simply refers to? I would have to come up with some mechanism and this seems to be a reasonable one, so why not just go with it and make it standard? -- Cody
Received on Friday, 19 April 2013 18:48:24 UTC