- From: Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:47:02 -0400
- Cc: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote: > > > On 17/04/13 16:53, David Wood wrote: >> >> >> On Apr 17, 2013, at 11:21, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com >> <mailto:lehors@us.ibm.com>> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> At the face to face meeting we discussed this issue but were unable to >>> come to a resolution. We decided to give everybody more time to think >>> about it. >>> I would like to propose that we resolve issue-35 by adding that >>> servers SHOULD not reuse URLs while acknowledging that they MAY under >>> certain circumstances. >>> >>> This is consistent with the resolution of ISSUE-24: Should DELETED >>> resources remain deleted? [2]: >>> >>> Close ISSUE-24 with the following: Delete the phrase in 4.5.1 that >>> says "Until ... Request URI"; add a sentence, "Clients should note >>> that severs may reuse a Request-URI under some circumstances." >>> >> >> +1. > > > +1 > +1 -- - Steve >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> -- >> http://about.me/david_wood >> >> >>> [1] >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/meeting/2013-03-15#ISSUE__2d_35__3a__POSTing_to_a_container_MUST_yield_a_fresh_URI >>> >>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/meeting/2012-11-01#resolution_4 >>> >>> Regards. >>> -- >>> Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2013 18:47:29 UTC