Re: Trying to close ISSUE-14

Hi Erik:
Are you saying that the ordering may be completely determined by the server?
This is the case when the collection is unordered.  The server can present members in
any order it likes.  But if the collection is ordered it has to be on some visible
facet of the data.
All the best, Ashok
On 4/2/2013 12:35 PM, Wilde, Erik wrote:
> hello raul.
>
> On 2013-04-02 01:50 , "Raúl García Castro" <rgarcia@fi.upm.es> wrote:
>> An LDPC server can indicate to a client the ordering of members in a
>> container page using an ldp:containerOrder property. This property has
>> as range a list of resources with two properties:
>> .- ldp:containerSortPredicate, which defines the property used for sorting
>> .- ldp:containerSortOrder, which defines the ordering (ascending or
>> descending) and is optional
> just reiterating the discussion with richard about his proposals: ordering
> can be entirely server-driven (i.e., not based on anything in the visible
> data). in this case, we might need some sort key in the data or something
> along those lines. that key would not have any relevance as actual data,
> it would simply be used to represent the sort order of the container.
>
> cheers,
>
> dret.
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 2 April 2013 16:55:16 UTC