- From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:23:27 +0200
- To: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2012 15:25:09 UTC
David Wood <david@3roundstones.com> wrote on 10/28/2012 09:09:35 PM: > From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com> >... > > Would the WG accept a compromise? I propose that clients MUST > inform servers if they expect null relative URIs to be placed with > the newly created URI for the resource. That way, servers only need > to incur the cost of the extra parsing and computation when they are > told they need to do it. Does that work? > > The flag can be passed to the server on the PUT URL by appending ? > updateNull or some such. > As I told David verbally, this doesn't work because the PUT URL has to be that of the resource to be created but it could be done using a header. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2012 15:25:09 UTC