- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 19:11:59 +0200
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <2CA58ACE-0BFC-4189-AEFC-F57DBE696C74@bblfish.net>
On 19 Oct 2012, at 19:06, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote: > Henry - where's the container? In the use case below the container would have been http://data.fm/ But thinking about it, one should not PUT a new resource into a container, because one might overwrite something existing there before. One should really POST it. > > On 19/10/12 17:38, Henry Story wrote: >> >> On 19 Oct 2012, at 18:32, Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com >> <mailto:ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>> wrote: >> >>> If I have another usecase. I have an, already created, resource R >>> which has a URI and I >>> want to put it in a container C. Is that possible >> >> it should be. >> >> you put >> >> <http://mydomain.com/foaf#me> a foaf:Person . >> >> to >> >> <http://data.fm/friends> >> >> then you would have >> >> <http://mydomain.com/foaf#me> a foaf:Person . >> >> in >> >> <http://data.fm/friends> >> >> if you PUT >> >> <#me> a foaf:Person >> >> to >> >> <http://data.fm/friends> >> >> Then you'll have that resources contain >> >> <http://data.fm/friends#me> a foaf:Person . >> >> >>> or would the conflation of >>> the container URI and resource URI prevent that? >> >> The new resource you PUT to, would now contain a metnion of the resource R. >> >> >>> Or would the URI of the resource in >>> the container just point to R which could have a different URI? >> >> The above should be the case. If it is not then one should open an issue. >> >> Henry >> >> >>> All the best, Ashok >>> >>> On 10/19/2012 9:22 AM, Arnaud Le Hors wrote: >>>> "Steve Battle" <steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk> wrote on 10/19/2012 >>>> 08:44:36 AM: >>>> >>>> > It's my understanding that The Opacity Axiom >>>> > <http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Axioms.html#opaque> applies only to >>>> clients >>>> > attempting to pick apart a URI, rather than to the server. >>>> > >>>> >>>> Indeed, but I'm not sure clients could live without knowing the magic >>>> involved in this scenario and even more so in the case of creating a >>>> resource using PUT. >>>> -- >>>> Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group >> >> Social Web Architect >> http://bblfish.net/ >> > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Friday, 19 October 2012 17:12:37 UTC