Re: LDP F2F agenda

Alright then, looks like we are covered.

Thanks,
Steve Speicher
IBM Rational Software
OSLC - Lifecycle integration inspired by the web -> 
http://open-services.net

Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS wrote on 10/19/2012 12:47:58 AM:

> From: Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
> To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org, 
> Date: 10/19/2012 12:59 AM
> Subject: Re: LDP F2F agenda
> 
> According to TPAC's calendar [1] there is a reception organized on 
Wednesdayevening: 
> 
> "Wednesday Evening: Plenary Reception for AC, Chairs, group 
participants, 
> AB, TAG, Offices staff, Team "
> 
> and the TPAC schedule page [2] reads "18h30-21h30: Dinner "
> 
> I did plan for a WG dinner on Thursday evening though. If anyone has any 

> idea/suggestion that would be nice. Maybe someone (Olivier? Alexandre?) 
has 
> local knowledge and can help us plan for something?
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2012/10/TPAC/
> [2] http://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2012#Plenary_Day_Schedule
> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
> 
> 
> Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM wrote on 10/18/2012 07:00:59 PM:
> 
> > From: Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM
> > To: Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS, 
> > Cc: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
> > Date: 10/18/2012 07:01 PM
> > Subject: Re: LDP F2F agenda
> > 
> > Perhaps I could suggest a Day 0 topic: Wednesday evening WG dinner!
> > 
> > A good addition?  Seems like a good way to end plenary day and kick 
> > off WG activities
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Steve Speicher
> > IBM Rational Software
> > OSLC - Lifecycle integration inspired by the web -> 
http://open-services.net
> > 
> > Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS wrote on 10/18/2012 08:06:41 PM:
> > 
> > > From: Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
> > > To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org, 
> > > Date: 10/18/2012 08:07 PM
> > > Subject: LDP F2F agenda
> > > 
> > > I've updated the F2F page [1] with objectives for the meeting and a 
more 
> > > detailed agenda. I would very much appreciate feedback on these. 
> > > 
> > > I found it rather challenging to set a precise agenda at this point 
but I 
> > > tried to take into account the following: 
> > > 
> > > - breaks and lunches are pretty much set by TPAC, although some 
slight 
> > > variation is possible 
> > > - the crux of the work is going to be to start digging into the list 
of 
> > > issues we now have and try to make progress on as many of them as 
possible 
> > > - I'm not sure how many issues we can go through before exhaustion 
starts 
> > > kicking in though 
> > > - to allow for remote participation from the US it would be nice to 
keep 
> > > some of this stuff to be discussed later rather sooner during the 
day 
> > > 
> > > To try and minimize the exhaustion factor I tried to split heavy 
topics into
> > > several chunks of time that I mixed with other topics. I didn't goas 
far as
> > > trying to list which issue will be discussed when though. Allocating 

> > > specific amount of time to each issue seems too arbitrary at this 
point and 
> > > I'm thinking we may be better off playing it by ear so that, for 
instance, 
> > > if we are tired we can tackle an easier issue next. 
> > > 
> > > However, if you think differently please let me know. If those who 
will be 
> > > participating remotely could let me know if there are topics or 
issues they 
> > > especially care about and at what time it might be more 
convenientfor them 
> > > to have them on the agenda I'll be happy to try and accommodate as
> > much as possible. 
> > > 
> > > All comments and suggestions are welcome. 
> > > Thanks. 
> > > 
> > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/F2F1 
> > > --
> > > Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group

Received on Friday, 19 October 2012 11:26:56 UTC