- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 12:04:29 -0400
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <507C340D.6070004@openlinksw.com>
On 10/15/12 10:31 AM, Gavin Carothers wrote: >> >Arnaud's position seems odd to me. Dereferencable URLs are always good IMO, but should Linked Data become somehow invalid if a URI doesn't dereference? Of course not. That suggests that dereferencable URLs are just a Good Thing, but not mandatory, just as they are in RDF. > Of course! The dereferencablity of a URI can change either from > network errors, or the simple passage of time. Just 'cause you can't > dereference a URI today doesn't mean it work work just fine in a day > or two. > > --Gavin > Gavin, Yes, de-reference is time variant. David: The statement above doesn't invalidate the requirement that Linked Data URIs have to be de-referencable. The de-reference characteristic != what happens at data access request time, since all data access calls on the Web are based on the time variant nature of actual data state. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Monday, 15 October 2012 16:05:02 UTC