W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > October 2012

Re: Editor's draft marked up with open ISSUES

From: Steve K Speicher <sspeiche@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 08:17:14 -0400
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Cc: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF8A50E608.54FE9E73-ON85257A98.00431F43-85257A98.00437ED2@us.ibm.com>
Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote on 10/15/2012 05:03:20 
AM:

> From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
> To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org, 
> Date: 10/15/2012 05:04 AM
> Subject: Re: Editor's draft marked up with open ISSUES
> 
> 
> 
> On 15/10/12 03:50, Steve K Speicher wrote:
> > Per timeline for our first public working draft [1], I have annotated 
the
> > latest draft with current open issues [2]
> >
> > [1] - http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Main_Page#Timeline
> > [2] - http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/hg/ldbp.html
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Steve Speicher
> > IBM Rational Software
> > OSLC - Lifecycle integration inspired by the web ->
> > http://open-services.net
> >
> 
> [[
> 5.1.3 Paging
> This section is non-normative
> ]]
> but it is referenced from 5.3.4 as the way to do paging.
> 
> Similarly, 5.3.2 -> 5.1.2 (although the link is broken).
> 
> It looks to me as if the paging needs to become normative and formally 
> defined.

Section 5.1.3 is intended to provide an informative introduction to the 
topic.  Sections 5.3.6.* define the normative sections and refer to the 
informative section to assist the reader on the concept.  If there are 
specific gaps in what is specified, please identify.  My goal is to say 
just enough, the paging model is intended to be kept simple.

Thanks,
Steve Speicher
IBM Rational Software
OSLC - Lifecycle integration inspired by the web -> 
http://open-services.net
Received on Monday, 15 October 2012 12:17:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:17:32 UTC