W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > October 2012

Re: ldp-ISSUE-15 (sharing binary resources and metadata): sharing binary resources and metadata [Linked Data Platform core]

From: Wilde, Erik <Erik.Wilde@emc.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 17:59:24 -0400
To: Linked Data Platform Working Group <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
CC: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CC933F21.8D8B%erik.wilde@emc.com>
hello all.

On 2012-10-04 12:39 , "James M Snell" <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
>Within Atompub, the distinction between edit and edit-media was largely a
>bit of a necessary hack given the lack of any kind of formal data model
>around a resource and it's data model. Within ldp, there exists the
>opportunity to tighten this up significantly by leveraging things like
>"describedBy" and "describes". A resource and that resource's metadata
>are essentially two distinct related resources (in fact, there can be a
>one-to-many relationship between the two). These can, and should be
>managed just as you would manage any other kind of resource relationship.

well said, and i agree that relations between "media resources" and
"description resources" should be represented and discoverable by standard
mechanisms. and btw, 'decries' so far is just a proposal but from what
i've seen nobody has objected, and all feedback i have received so far
said that there should be an inverse of 'describedby'. so i am encouraging
this group to have a look at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wilde-describes-link-01 and provide
feedback. if i don't get any pushback, i will submit this draft for expert
review better sooner that later, so that proper linking between resources
could be established based on existing standards, both for 'describedby'
as well as for 'describes'.

cheers,

dret.
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2012 22:00:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:17:32 UTC