Re: forms, direction, query, etc …

On 11/19/12 12:40 PM, Roger Menday wrote:
>
> Henry opened up some discussion at the end of our phone conference 
> today, regarding his proposal about forms and query.
>
> I've got to say that I thought Henry's proposal [1] was really elegant.
> I also think that it is a solution for a problem that is very relevant 
> to LDP.
>
> If it has a flaw, it that a client needs to be SPARQL aware - which I 
> don't think will help uptake. I made my proposal on this topic at 
> [2]. I'll freely admit that it does not have the elegance of Henry's 
> use of SPARQL to drive interaction from the client, but, what it does 
> have is simplicity! It is sort of like "duck-typed creation" .... it 
> doesn't offer anything elaborate (repeated, options, etc.) at the moment.
>
> Roger
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2012Nov/0144.html
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2012Oct/0274.html
>
Since this is about Linked Data, and TimBL's Linked Data meme [1] is the 
basis of LDP, why should SPARQL be a problem? Note point #3 .


Links:

1. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html -- Linked Data meme.

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen