- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 16:51:39 +0000
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2012 14:55:39 UTC
On 11/13/12 1:19 PM, Roger Menday wrote: > Actually, wrt uptake of our standard, I think what the LDP working group needs is something that does*NOT* require the semantic reasoning tools that we have ...:) > > Roger The moment you commit to the RDF model you commit to inference. Of course, like screen resolution, fidelity will vary so you might no need the higher fidelity of OWL etc.. You can't have a self describing resource without a modicum of machine readable semantics. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2012 14:55:39 UTC