- From: Jürgen Jakobitsch <j.jakobitsch@semantic-web.at>
- Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 10:38:24 +0100
- To: Niclas Hoyer <niclas@verbugt.de>
- Cc: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <1352367504.5275.24.camel@linux-1rgw.site>
hi, for intro : my name is jürgen jakobitsch, i'm a software developer mainly concerned with linked data applications. i'm the developer of things like webIDRealm [1], tuqs [2] and one of the developers of skos server poolparty [3]. a while ago i switched to linked data only (besides some applications) with my own domain, an example resource can be seen here [4]. a sample webpage based on that server can be seen here [5], it is basically only javascript and sparql. back then i was starting to implement the graph-store-protocol [6], but switched to changesets only for manipulating data. now just a short comment on LDPC : this discussion looks a lot like => application development <= to me. i'm pretty sure there's reason these containers came to be and i don't want to confuse anybody or start discussions again, that long have been dealt with, but wouldn't it be better when dealing with a spec to define a way a ld-server can be extended? with my server i have the possibility of what i call http-plugins that intercept http-requests and do something. there are many ways this can be used, think of the following http-plugins : - indexer-plugin (a http-plugin, that indexes data to a lucene index) - monitoring-plugin (a http-plugin for, you guessed, does monitoring of the most important resources) - ping-back-plugin (sends ping-backs to interested parties about resource-updates, you could for example subscribe to certain resources and be notified if these change) if there was a generic way of extending an ldp's behaviour in certain situations, ldp-containers would just be one implementation of such an extension. just a thought... wkr http://www.turnguard.com/turnguard [1] http://webid.turnguard.com/WebIDTestServer/ [2] http://sourceforge.net/p/tuqs/wiki/Home/ [3] http://www.poolparty.biz/ [4] http://www.turnguard.com/turnguard [5] http://business.turnguard.com/html/ [6] http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-http-rdf-update/ On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 22:38 +0100, Niclas Hoyer wrote: > Hi, > > is there a simple way to create a ldp container? I thought of turning a > ldp resource into a container just by changing the rdf information, so > if http://example.org/resource1 is a ldp resource the following HTTP > request could turn the resource into a container: > > PUT /resource1 HTTP/1.1 > Host: example.org > Content-Type: text/turtle > Content-Length: 188 > > @prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/>. > @prefix ldp: <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp#>. > > <http://example.org/resource1> > a ldp:Container ; > dcterms:title "A new empty container" . > > Should we cover this in an extra use case? > > A possible implementation could just start with a ldp resource. The user > or client programs could create containers as they need them. I was > thinking of a sioc:Thread that could also be a ldp:Container, so that > other clients could reply on the thread easily. > > -- > Niclas > > -- | Jürgen Jakobitsch, | Software Developer | Semantic Web Company GmbH | Mariahilfer Straße 70 / Neubaugasse 1, Top 8 | A - 1070 Wien, Austria | Mob +43 676 62 12 710 | Fax +43.1.402 12 35 - 22 COMPANY INFORMATION | web : http://www.semantic-web.at/ | foaf : http://company.semantic-web.at/person/juergen_jakobitsch PERSONAL INFORMATION | web : http://www.turnguard.com | foaf : http://www.turnguard.com/turnguard | g+ : https://plus.google.com/111233759991616358206/posts | skype : jakobitsch-punkt | xmlns:tg = "http://www.turnguard.com/turnguard#"
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2012 09:38:57 UTC