- From: Wilde, Erik <Erik.Wilde@emc.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 10:10:26 -0400
- To: "nathan@webr3.org" <nathan@webr3.org>, "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
- CC: Andrei Sambra <andrei@fcns.eu>
hello nathan. On Nov 3, 2012, at 4:51, "Nathan" <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: > I'd suggest that the vocabulary/predicates used are the thing that need > specified, since "MUST be RDF" doesn't really help anybody understand > the messages. that's what i was suggesting with mapping the error document model to an RDF schema of some sort. MUST would be too strong, though, but we might want to say that "error documents SHOULD support RDF representation(s)". not sure we should go as far as suggesting a specific syntax. cheers, dret.
Received on Saturday, 3 November 2012 14:11:26 UTC