- From: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 23:58:11 +0100
- To: "Wilde, Erik" <Erik.Wilde@emc.com>
- CC: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>, Andrei Sambra <andrei@fcns.eu>
On 11/02/2012 09:45 PM, Wilde, Erik wrote: > hello. > > On Nov 2, 2012, at 12:54, "Andrei Sambra" <andrei@fcns.eu > <mailto:andrei@fcns.eu>> wrote: >> For example, applications may not "speak" LDP at start (i.e. misusing >> REST verbs), thus resulting in '405 Method Not Allowed' errors. It would >> be nice to have some HTML describing what they did wrong. > > instead of just using HTML, i suggest to have a look at > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http-problem-01 and see how > well it would fit. i think pretty good. the next version is supposed to > add XML support (i'm working on a schema). There are some interesting ideas in this spec, but in our case, the client already understands RDF, so I don't see why we would return anything but RDF for "problem details". Alexandre. > > cheers, > > dret.
Received on Friday, 2 November 2012 22:58:18 UTC