- From: Kevin Page <kevin.page@oerc.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:24:31 +0000
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 16:29 +0000, Andy Seaborne wrote: > On 15/12/12 23:52, Steve Battle wrote: > > > Ashok: > > By "Attribute" you mean a property of the container? > Or is this per container entry? > Or a platform managed aspect not in the RDF? > > >> = YES > > > > -0.5 > > > > I really don't like this. If this were false then why use a container in > > the first place. Just use aggregation and describe the collection in > > RDF. The LDP spec doesn't need to be concerned with what we can say in RDF. > > > > Steve. > > While I like this as a principle, there are some details ... > > * LDP-C have paging. RDF collections and/or containers in a LDP-R do not. There is an open issue for supporting pagination of LDP-R: http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/33 The need for general support of pagination -- such that it's not limited to containers -- was made at the F2F (and supported by those present AFAIR). Furthermore, pagination seems to me to be a service level behaviour, so it's appropriate to specify this within LDP. cheers, Kevin.
Received on Monday, 17 December 2012 15:24:55 UTC