- From: Wilde, Erik <Erik.Wilde@emc.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 14:32:52 -0500
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>, David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- CC: "ashok.malhotra@oracle.com" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>, "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
hello henry. On 2012-12-11 5:44 , "Henry Story" <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: >I am very keen on containers within containers. and we definitely shouldn't disallow them, i would say. i think we should be silent. there are many many things people/applications may want to overlay in terms or more advanced semantics and interactions, but unless we have clear requirement to support interactions, we can just leave this to implementations or LDPv2. >- Perhaps containers in containers can be used for content negotiation. A >content negotiated resources would just be a container > that only has documents that are representations of one another. for this it might be useful to consider HTTP content negotiation, unless you're ok with making your content negotiation invisible on the HTTP level. cheers, dret.
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2012 19:33:40 UTC