- From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 08:21:32 -0500
- To: "ashok.malhotra@oracle.com" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Cc: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
On Dec 10, 2012, at 19:24, Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> wrote: > > On 12/10/2012 2:37 PM, Wilde, Erik wrote: >>> - Can collections contain collections i.e. are collections hierarchical? >>> >(we may decide, no) >> this is a very important point. > I agree. Let's see what other members of the WG feel about this issue. > For example, suppose for a minute that the content was RDF. Does a hierarchical > collection structure map gracefully to the RDF model? An important point indeed! Hierarchies of containers are necessary in my opinion, but I can't see a good reason not to allow (MAY) a graph structure that would map cleanly to the RDF model. URIs are hierarchical, and so are file systems, but links work in both systems, making graphs. Does anyone have a good argument against containers within containers (I hope not). Regards, Dave > > Ashok >
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2012 13:22:06 UTC