- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 07:56:19 -0400
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <503CB1E3.3040106@openlinksw.com>
On 8/28/12 7:48 AM, Olivier Berger wrote: > Hi. > > I can't remember if the pingback was suggested as being important in > LDP. > > So in case, here's a suggestion to discuss whether the Semantic Pingback > mechanisms should be part of LDP. > > I think it is generally interesting in the Linked Data world to be able > to get such pingback mechanisms, even though they may have > implementation difficulties. > > For more details, maybe http://aksw.org/Projects/SemanticPingback is a > useful reference, but I'm in no way an expert on that topic, so I hope > others will have more interesting resources. > > Would this be part of the user stories / use cases in your opinion ? > > Hope this helps. > > Best regards, Circa. 2012 we don't have what used to be known as DDE (Dynamic Data Exchange) on Windows 3.0. Notifications services are the key to making a webby variant of the aforementioned protocol. I would expect Pingback notifications to be an integral part of any serious Linked Data effort. This is absolutely crucial. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Tuesday, 28 August 2012 11:56:50 UTC