- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 08:01:08 -0400
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <50210384.1060409@openlinksw.com>
On 8/7/12 3:48 AM, Wilde, Erik wrote: > hello. > > On 2012-08-06 23:05 , "Kingsley Idehen" <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: >> We are basically trying to work out a loosely coupled architecture >> for data object identification, representation, and access via: >> 1. URIs >> 2. Structured Data >> 3. RESTful interaction patterns. >> It can't be more than that :-) > i am not sure that people agree that these are the only constraints we > have. because if that were true, > http://dret.typepad.com/dretblog/atom-landscape.html is the answer, is a > standard, provides all kinds of features beyond the use cases we have in > our document, and thus would be the way to go, instead of defining > something new. > > cheers, > > dret. Of course AtomPub isn't the answer re. fine-grained data access. You need what's outlined above which is basically the fundamental architecture of the Web (AWWW) itself. The architecture of the Web is dexterous enough to handle all of the fine-grained data access needs that these conversations are hovering about. BTW -- my products implemented AtomPub before the ink dried on the initial specs. We still support it today and part of many protocols we support. None of our protocol handling heuristics would work modulo AWWW dexterity. Decouple the letters R-D-F from Linked Data and all the real power of AWWW is there to be exploited in ways only limited by our imagination. > > > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2012 12:00:14 UTC