- From: Wilde, Erik <Erik.Wilde@emc.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 03:26:20 -0400
- To: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
- CC: "reza.bfar@oracle.com" <reza.bfar@oracle.com>
hello reza. On 2012-08-06 19:15 , "Reza B'Far (Oracle)" <reza.bfar@oracle.com> wrote: >To this end, and your other comments, I would propose that we arrive at >a taxonomy that has, at least, the following - >LDP-DM - Some Data Model that represents the domain we're trying to >address independent of any other sem-web standards (RDF, SPARQL, etc.) >LDP-RDF - Linkage of RDF to LDP-DM >[Others] that's what i pointed out a while ago, saying that LDP-DM essentially exists in the form of atom/atompub (and the atom landscape http://dret.typepad.com/dretblog/atom-landscape.html providing additional capabilities in that space), and we wouldn't have to reinvent the wheel and could simply use existing established standards. the feedback was that people disliked the idea of using something that is not RDF at heart, and thus reusing atom/atompub would not be a possibility. cheers, dret.
Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2012 07:26:44 UTC