Fwd: Re: On: Group Note "LDP Access Control"

Should have copied ldp-comments.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: On: Group Note "LDP Access Control"
Date: 	Thu, 18 Sep 2014 16:42:57 -0400
From: 	Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
Reply-To: 	ashok.malhotra@oracle.com
Organization: 	Oracle Corporation
To: 	Olle Olsson <olleo@sics.se>

Hello Olle:
Thank you for your comments.  At least someone is reading the specs :-)

The reason for saying that the requirements are for the WG is that there
is a possibility that the work will be done in the LDP WG after it is rechartered.
But, yes, this is a general technology, not specific to the LDP WG.
We can fix these when/if we republish the note.
All the best, Ashok

On 9/18/2014 12:57 PM, Olle Olsson wrote:
> Just two remarks on the recently publiched Group Note on LDP Access Control
>      http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-ldp-acr-20140916/
> (1) The abstract starts with the sentence:
>> This note discusses usecases and requirements for Access Control for the Linked Data Platform WG.
> I expected that such usecases and requirements described in this doc primarily pertain to some technology, not to the WG. So is there a specific reason that it says "... for the Linked Data Platform *WG*", and not "... for the Linked Data *Platform*"?
> Especially as the third sentence says:
>> The work delineated in the charter may be pursued in the Linked Data Platform WG or an independent, related WG
> And the doc actually ends with an "Outline for a Access Control WG".
> (2) Spelling:
> "Terminology"
>> ACG: An Access Control Graph describes the permitted modes of access for particular agents to apecific resources.
> Should end with "specific resources".
> Regards,
> /olle

Received on Thursday, 18 September 2014 20:45:07 UTC