Re: Improved LDP Test Report for Callimachus

Hi Dave,

On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 9:49 AM, David Wood <david@3roundstones.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> We understand that the current Callimachus test report at [1] suggests
> that we are still missing three (3) IndirectContainer tests that are MUSTs.
> They are:
> - IndirectContainer-CreateIndirectContainer
>
There appears to be missing an earl:Assertion for this one ^


> - IndirectContainer-ContainsLdpcUri
> - IndirectContainer-PostResource
>
There are 2 earl:Assertion entries for this test ^ (assuming copy and paste
error)

We have tested all three of these manually and claim 100% compliance on the
> MUST IndirectContainer tests.  However, we aren’t sure how to construct the
> earl report so that is correctly reflected.
>
> Another earl report is attached, but the earl:mode for these three tests
> is earl:notTested. Can someone tell us how to edit this to mark them
> correctly as tested and passed?
>
I'd set:
     earl:mode earl:manual;

Optionally, it would be good to add also a triple to the earl:result (see
other earl:manual test assertions) with predicate dcterms:description to
explain your testing, even if just to say it was manually tested.

It would be nice to have these automated of course.

- Steve


> Regards,
> Dave
> --
> http://about.me/david_wood
>
> [1]
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/tests/reports/ldp.html#test-subjects
>
>
>
>
>
> On Oct 14, 2014, at 22:39, Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > WG report has been regenerated:
> > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/tests/reports/ldp.html
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Steve Speicher
> > http://stevespeicher.me
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 5:43 PM, David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
> wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Please find attached an improved LDP test report for Callimachus. We
> are closing on it. Thanks for republishing our results.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Dave
> >> --
> >> http://about.me/david_wood
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>