- From: Andrei Sambra <andrei@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:38:51 -0500
- To: public-ldp-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <548F1CAB.6010102@w3.org>
On 12/15/2014 12:21 PM, Alexandre Bertails wrote: > All, > > I have implemented the resolution from the meeting this morning re: > symmetry. The four operations are: > > * Add: never fails > * Delete: never fails > * AddNew: can fail > * AddExisting: can fail > > As a reminder, the plan is to publish as CR this coming Thursday, and > people are invited to make comments before if they see issues. > > Andrei, can you take the lead to prepare the document and issue a > PubReq? Thanks. Yes, I'll get started right away. -- Andrei > > Alexandre > > > On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Alexandre Bertails > <alexandre@bertails.org> wrote: >> All, >> >> We are done reflecting all the resolutions for LD Patch [1] we made in >> the past weeks. >> >> The Change Log now includes: >> >> * Negative indexes in Path and Slice (ISSUE-102 and ISSUE-104) >> * Add and Delete now takes Turtle as argument (ISSUE-101) >> * New operations AddNew and DeleteAny (ISSUE-103) >> >> Also, based on a comment from TimBL on "reified rdf:List considered >> harmful", the UpdateList algorithm was moved in an appendix section. >> >> One more thing: the Error Codes for Delete/AddNew are still 422, and >> not 409. I do agree that most of the time, an error would result from >> a Conflict, but when the server is trying to delete a non-existing >> triple, it has no way to know it was a conflict error at this point >> (you can see that from the code [2]). It could be a regular error from >> the client. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Alexandre, for the editors. >> >> [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/ldpatch/ldpatch.html >> [2] https://github.com/w3c/banana-rdf/blob/topic/ldpatch/ldpatch/src/main/scala/org/w3/banana/ldpatch/Semantics.scala#L78 >
Received on Monday, 15 December 2014 17:38:58 UTC