- From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 05:59:02 -0500
- To: Alexandre Bertails <alexandre@bertails.org>
- Cc: "public-ldp-comments@w3.org" <public-ldp-comments@w3.org>
Sent from my portable device. > On 11 Dec 2014, at 23:24, Alexandre Bertails <alexandre@bertails.org> wrote: > > Hi Tim, > > The group opened ISSUE-103 [1] after the feedback you provided. We > discussed it during the past two meetings [2]. > > Here are the solutions we considered: > > a) We add a new Assert operation to assert that a triple exists, as > defined by Pierre-Antoine in [3] > > b) We add a new mode strict/lax operations (syntax to be defined) to > change the semantics of Add and Delete on the fly. (question: what > would be the default?) > > c) We define 4 operations (I made up the new names, they are not set in stone): > * Add to add a triple, doesn't fail if the triple was already there > * Delete to delete a triple, which fails if the triple didn't exist > * AddNew to add a triple, succeeds only if there was not such triple > * DeleteAny to delete a triple, never fails > > d) We recommend the use of etags, and Add/Delete never fail. > > There was no strong consensus (maybe a _little_ preference for b or > c?), so the group decided to let the editors to come back with a > proposal, and to check with you if you had a strong preference. > > Do you have any preference? > Yes c by a long way Modes bad. Make it difficult merge documents in a language . Difficult to find errors Different commands with clear individual semantics good. Scuse brevity Timbl > Alexandre > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/103 > [2] http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2014-12-08#line0136 > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2014Nov/0096.html >
Received on Friday, 12 December 2014 10:59:11 UTC