- From: Alexandre Bertails <alexandre@bertails.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 23:24:16 -0500
- To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Cc: public-ldp-comments@w3.org
Hi Tim, The group opened ISSUE-103 [1] after the feedback you provided. We discussed it during the past two meetings [2]. Here are the solutions we considered: a) We add a new Assert operation to assert that a triple exists, as defined by Pierre-Antoine in [3] b) We add a new mode strict/lax operations (syntax to be defined) to change the semantics of Add and Delete on the fly. (question: what would be the default?) c) We define 4 operations (I made up the new names, they are not set in stone): * Add to add a triple, doesn't fail if the triple was already there * Delete to delete a triple, which fails if the triple didn't exist * AddNew to add a triple, succeeds only if there was not such triple * DeleteAny to delete a triple, never fails d) We recommend the use of etags, and Add/Delete never fail. There was no strong consensus (maybe a _little_ preference for b or c?), so the group decided to let the editors to come back with a proposal, and to check with you if you had a strong preference. Do you have any preference? Alexandre [1] http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/103 [2] http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2014-12-08#line0136 [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2014Nov/0096.html
Received on Friday, 12 December 2014 04:24:43 UTC