W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ld4lt@w3.org > September 2014

RE: [ACTION 11] Initial DCAT to meta-share mapping

From: Penny Labropoulou <penny@ilsp.gr>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 15:53:00 +0300
To: "'Dave Lewis'" <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>, <public-ld4lt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <043801cfc775$fdfe0d60$f9fa2820$@ilsp.gr>
Hi Dave and all.
I've made some comments (in italics to easily spot) at the wiki for the
MetaShare to DCAT mapping. Please, note the following:
- the proposal looks only at dcat:dataset and dcat:distribution but there
are also dcat:catalog and dcat:catalogRecord. MetaShare has not looked at
catalogs at all, but some of the elements can be mapped to
dcat:catalogRecord properties. Should we look into this also? 
- Some of the comments refer to the XML implementation of MetaShare (i.e.
elements that have not been included in the current version of MS/RDF-OWL)
but I have added them as they will be of use for the final XML to RDF
conversion of the original MetaShare schema.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Lewis [mailto:dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie] 
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 3:44 PM
To: public-ld4lt@w3.org
Subject: [ACTION 11] Initial DCAT to meta-share mapping

Hi all,
I've made an initial analysis of how we can make use DCAT in revising the
meta-share vocabulary at:

Some points we can discuss on the call shortly:

1) classifying ms:LanguageResource as a dcat:Dataset - see:

2) separating meta-data about the resource from meta-data about its
accessible forms or distributions - see:

3) (which I haven't documented yet) is using dcat:theme attribute for
LanguageResource properties that comply to a specific scheme or taxonomy
using skos:concept and skos:ConceptScheme. This would make sense for
ms:domain, but also perhaps for making explicit the subclass taxonomy
LanguageResource, e.g. Corpus etc.

Talk to you shortly,
Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2014 12:54:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:16:10 UTC