- From: Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 10:37:50 +0100
- To: public-ld4lt@w3.org
Hi all, At the last call we discussed the template for the meta-share ontology as kindly initiated by Jorge: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15SE4_qAqYFostmD52uKxpkCPZh1f5TrPeoXKNTlDYpQ/edit#gid=0 with further information at: https://www.w3.org/community/ld4lt/wiki/Meta-Share_OWL_metamodel We discussed modules for this to help break down the taks and to partition parts that might take more time to agree or need involvement by different subgroups compared to others. We already agreed to have a CORE component and split out a LICENSES module, but had asked for other suggestions. I'd like to propose two further modules: RESOURCE_TYPE corresponding to the resrouceComponentType part of the meta-share schema: http://www.meta-share.org/portal/knowledgebase/Resourcecomponenttype and USAGE_TYPE corresponding to the usageInfo part of the meta-share schema: http://www.meta-share.org/portal/knowledgebase/Usageinfo These contain large enumerations that could both be subject to ongoing debate and likely candidate for extension/specialization. By separating these out we can avoid such debate delaying work on the CORe module. Should we add these as modules to the spreadsheet? From an ontology modelling viewpoint, how should we manage the modelling in these proposed modules, would a class taxonomy be a better approach and an enumeration? Kind Regards, Dave
Received on Thursday, 22 May 2014 09:34:28 UTC