Re: [ld4lt] MetaShare OWL metamodel: first steps

Hi Felix/Penny/all

2014-04-25 7:40 GMT+02:00 Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>:

> One aspect of the LD4LT group is that there are many members not
> knowledgable about technical details of semantic web technology. That is
> good IMO since the group will be a place to learn. For the concrete topic
> of metamodel, I am wondering whether editing the ontology directly will
> lead to loosing these people. In other similar exercises (= mapping
> existing formats using an ontology) we used a tabular representation to
> develop the mappings, and the ontology was just a file edited by the
> technical experts. See here
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/mediaont-10/#mpeg-table
>
> I am wondering whether such an approach may make sense here too?
>
>
That makes a lot of sense to me. @Felix: in your experience... did you edit
the tabular representation in the wiki or somewhere else?



> About
> http://www.w3.org/community/ld4lt/track/
> if you want to gather issues around the ontology development, I would
> create a new product here
> http://www.w3.org/community/ld4lt/track/products/new
> e.g. "META-SHARE metadata model“, and then for each discussion topic an
> issue
> http://www.w3.org/community/ld4lt/track/issues/new
> e.g. for this topic “how to work on the model: ontology editing vs.
> tabular mapping vs. …“
> then, using the identifiers of the issues will lead to mails automatically
> being gathered in the tracker system.
>
> I just did that and this for above product + issue. This mail then should
> be listed under
>
> Thanks for this!

Regards,
Jorge

https://www.w3.org/community/ld4lt/track/issues/2
>
> Then, making an agenda for a call can be done via this link
> https://www.w3.org/community/ld4lt/track/agenda
> which shows you issues and action items.
>
> Best,
>
> Felix
>
> I see three options here (feel free to propose others):
> - use WebProtege (http://webprotege.stanford.edu/)
> - use the ld4lt wiki
> - use Github
> Each one has its pros/cons. We can analyse them and take a decision in the
> next telco.
>
> The starting point will be the ontology already developed at Universitat
> Pompeu Fabra, which can be found at http://purl.org/ms-lod/MetaShare.ttl
>
> @Dave: do I have to register this activity as an issue in the tracking
> system? http://www.w3.org/community/ld4lt/track/options
>
> Best regards,
>
> --
> Jorge Gracia, PhD
> Ontology Engineering Group
> Artificial Intelligence Department
> Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
> http://delicias.dia.fi.upm.es/~jgracia/
>
>
>


-- 
Jorge Gracia, PhD
Ontology Engineering Group
Artificial Intelligence Department
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
http://delicias.dia.fi.upm.es/~jgracia/