W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ld4lt@w3.org > April 2014

Re: [ld4lt] MetaShare OWL metamodel: first steps

From: Philipp Cimiano <cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 10:20:47 +0200
Message-ID: <5358C95F.5040403@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de>
To: public-ld4lt@w3.org
Dear Jorge, all,

  thanks for sharing this with us. I would like to follow up on an 
interesting comment that Andreas Blumauer from the SW Company made on 
our last meeting (Andreas: I assume you are on this list?).

Andreas mentioned the importance of being able to discover relevant and 
appropriate ressources. This use case is core for the LIDER project in 
which many people here are involved and I think it would be great to 
have some more specific requirements on this. These requirements might 
then end up as a use case in a deliverable of LIDER and thus be part of 
our roadmap. In addition, we would try to support the corresponding use 
case at a technical level.

In order to get this started, it would be great to have some more 
specific examples of what Andreas had in mind.

Andreas: would you be willing to provide us some examples of particular 
needs in the form of pseudo-queries, e.g. "I need to find a lexicon in 
the German language on a particular domain etc.". That would be very 
helpful. I can try to narrate the whole thing into a coherent piece of 
text that can end up in one of the LIDER deliverables on relevant 
business cases.

Btw. Jorge and myself will be visiting the Metashare people at UPF 
tomorrow, so if there is anything that this group wants as to clarify 
there, please let us know latest today ;-)

Thanks and best regards,

Philipp.

Am 23.04.14 13:11, schrieb Jorge Gracia:
> Dear all,
>
> In our first telco I took the action of starting the discussion about 
> the new OWL/RDF version of the MetaShare metadata model for 
> documenting Language Resources. For the moment I have created a space 
> in the wiki to start collecting information and related pointers. See 
> https://www.w3.org/community/ld4lt/wiki/Main_Page#OWL_Metamodel_for_Language_Resources
> We have to decide how to proceed for editing collaboratively the 
> ontology in a simple way. I see three options here (feel free to 
> propose others):
> - use WebProtege (http://webprotege.stanford.edu/)
> - use the ld4lt wiki
> - use Github
> Each one has its pros/cons. We can analyse them and take a decision in 
> the next telco.
>
> The starting point will be the ontology already developed at 
> Universitat Pompeu Fabra, which can be found at 
> http://purl.org/ms-lod/MetaShare.ttl
>
> @Dave: do I have to register this activity as an issue in the tracking 
> system? http://www.w3.org/community/ld4lt/track/options
>
> Best regards,
>
> -- 
> Jorge Gracia, PhD
> Ontology Engineering Group
> Artificial Intelligence Department
> Universidad Polit├ęcnica de Madrid
> http://delicias.dia.fi.upm.es/~jgracia/ 
> <http://delicias.dia.fi.upm.es/%7Ejgracia/>


-- 

Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano

Phone: +49 521 106 12249
Fax: +49 521 106 12412
Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de

Forschungsbau Intelligente Systeme (FBIIS)
Raum 2.307
Universit├Ąt Bielefeld
Inspiration 1
33619 Bielefeld
Received on Thursday, 24 April 2014 08:21:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:16:08 UTC