- From: Ben De Meester <ben.demeester@ugent.be>
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 11:04:06 +0100
- To: Anastasia Dimou <anastasia.dimou@kuleuven.be>, "public-kg-construct@w3.org" <public-kg-construct@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <cd21a3f1-2d90-4f38-8017-b183033b6273@ugent.be>
Hi Anastasia, The sheet is 90% Open-Refine functions, added with a couple of functions that stem from use cases from our side, and Tobias volunteered in yesterday's meeting to double check this list with his use cases, so I actually think we're aligned :) Kind regards, Ben Ben De Meester Researcher Semantic Web imec - Ghent University - IDLab | Faculty of Engineering and Architecture | Department of Electronics and Information Systems Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 122, 9052 Ghent, Belgium t: +32 9 331 49 56 | e: ben.demeester@ugent.be <\"mailto:ben.demeester@ugent.be\"> | URL: https://ben.de-meester.org/#me <\"https://ben.de-meester.org/#me%5C"> On 20/11/2024 21:38, Anastasia Dimou wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > I’m not sure where you expect answers to this request, here to the > issue or the excel sheet, but my two cents on this: I think that the > need for certain functions should be first driven by use cases and > then personal agreement could come to verify if these functions would > indeed be part of a first set of default functions. > > Btw, I recall the intention in the past was to consider the Open > Refine set of functions as the default as these are the most frequent > encountered cleaning functions, that’s not considered anymore? > > Kind regards, > > Anastasia > > *From: *Ben De Meester <ben.demeester@ugent.be> > *Date: *Wednesday, 20 November 2024 at 15:53 > *To: *public-kg-construct@w3.org <public-kg-construct@w3.org> > *Subject: *Default set of functions: first proposal available > > At > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mV3gdvcqwPQNAqPq20cGrKS-5DE0jXGtTjO8eACpEiA/edit?gid=0#gid=0 > <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mV3gdvcqwPQNAqPq20cGrKS-5DE0jXGtTjO8eACpEiA/edit?gid=0#gid=0> > there's a first set of functions that could be part of a base set of > RML functions > (context: https://github.com/kg-construct/rml-fnml/issues/44 > <https://github.com/kg-construct/rml-fnml/issues/44>). > Any validation would be appreciated, so feel free to comment, add your > name to functions that you really care about or really don't want to have. > > We're well aware that this will only be a first set and a bit of a > moving target, so I personally would suggest to have a first version > out asap, reality will tell us what we missed later on :). > > In two weeks, I'll finalize a first version. > > Kind regards, > Ben > > -- > > > Ben De Meester > Researcher Semantic Web > imec - Ghent University - IDLab | Faculty of Engineering and > Architecture | Department of Electronics and Information Systems > Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 122, 9052 Ghent, Belgium > t: +32 9 331 49 56 | e: ben.demeester@ugent.be > <http://%22mailto:ben.demeester@ugent.be/%22> | URL: > https://ben.de-meester.org/#me </%22https:/ben.de-meester.org/#me\"> >
Received on Friday, 22 November 2024 10:04:14 UTC