Re: follow up on languages - what is your opinion?

Ah yes, I'm certainly interested, I'd like to end up with a kind of white
paper with challenges and (partial) solutions.

My current idea would be that each challenge is accompanied with at least
one test case, which is a combination of '[set of input files]' and
'[resulting output graph]', we could then even challenge the current test
cases, and have a kind of competition between languages and processors.
Added advantage would be that this is mapping language independent. This
could also result in a set of 'best practices', i.e., 'if you have
construction problem X, you can solve it with mapping language Y and
mapping document Z' :P.

So, above is my first suggestion to the question 'how to represent these
challenges'. which imo. is the first to be discussed in the smaller group
of people :P.

Kind regards,
Ben
Ben De Meester
Researcher Semantic Web
imec - Ghent University - IDLab | Faculty of Engineering and
Architecture | Department
of Electronics and Information Systems
Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 122, 9052 Ghent, Belgium
t: +32 9 331 49 56 | e: ben.demeester@ugent.be | URL:
https://ben.de-meester.org/#me
<https://ben.de-meester.org/#me>


Op do 29 okt. 2020 om 18:04 schreef Anastasia Dimou (UGent-imec) <
Anastasia.Dimou@ugent.be>:

> Dear all,
>
>
>
> Following our discussions during the 1st bi-weekly meeting, we would like
> to invite you to share your thoughts about the following suggestion:
>
>
>
> David and I suggest
>
>    - *organizing a smaller group of people to discuss further on the
>    challenges* (https://github.com/kg-construct/mapping-challenges) or
>    more challenges that can still be collected at this repository.
>    - *concluding on a set of challenges *that are not completely
>    addressed by all mapping languages and consider them as part of a
>    forthcoming workshop’s call. The idea is then that people can propose
>    their approach of tackling the challenge(s) as a scientific papers.
>    Different approaches for different languages may be then presented and
>    discussed during the aforementioned workshop.
>
>
>
> What are your comments, suggestions, feedback on what is proposed and how
> to proceed?
> And of course, would you intend to participate in any of the two above?
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Anastasia
>