- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 14:58:14 -0400
- To: public-json-ld-wg@w3.org
On 4/26/21 2:40 PM, Dan Brickley wrote: > My main concern here is with the ability to document Schema.org by saying > "For use in search engines, Schema.org can be written in JSON-LD 1.0" and > having something reliable to point to. Maybe sometime it'll be possible to > say that about 1.1 too. Should we be looking at requesting the superseded > status to be restored, or could the popup warning shown on rescinded > specifications be made less pushy and upselly? For what it's worth, I agree with Dan and share his concerns regarding messaging to his community of interest. Perhaps a sticky footer, placed at the bottom of the page, in green/orange, that says: "There is a newer version of this specification. For the latest version please look at: ..."? -- manu -- Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Veres One Decentralized Identifier Blockchain Launches https://tinyurl.com/veres-one-launches
Received on Monday, 26 April 2021 18:58:31 UTC