W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-json-ld-wg@w3.org > March 2020

Re: Implementation report

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 07:44:11 -0700
Message-Id: <0CC3B86B-2B6B-46BB-B0A4-95FA195CAC66@greggkellogg.net>
Cc: public-json-ld-wg@w3.org
To: Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller.eu>
Thanks, Julien, I’ll work to integrate your report. I’ll let you know if there are issues I’ll need your help to resolve.

Congratulations on completing your implementation.

Gregg Kellogg

Sent from my iPad

> On Mar 31, 2020, at 12:37 AM, Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller.eu> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> attached is an implementation report for guile-jsonld, an
> implementation of the JsonLD API in the GNU Guile language.
> 
> I haven't yet released a version of that library, so this report is for
> the current master branch. If you need a release, then I'll make one
> from that commit and give it a proper version number.
> 
> I haven't used or produced turtle documents before, but I tried to
> produce a document that hopefully makes sense. I'm not sure if what I
> did is correct, especially in the results, so please tell me if
> anything is wrong, so i can correct it.
> 
> My library implements only JsonLD version 1.1, so I skiped tests
> designed only for JsonLD 1.0. I still included them with a result of
> earl:inapplicable. Is it correct, or should I simply not include
> skiped tests?
> 
> I haven't implemented any of the features tested by the to RDF and from
> RDF test suites, and my implementation of features tested by the HTML
> test suite is lacking (my main issue being that there doesn't seem to
> be an HTML parser for Guile, I used an xml parser instead, but it's not
> enough). I haven't included any results from these three test suites.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Julien Lepiller
> <guile-jsonld-earl.ttl>
Received on Tuesday, 31 March 2020 14:44:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 31 March 2020 14:44:31 UTC