- From: Benjamin Young <byoung@bigbluehat.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 18:10:33 +0000
- To: W3C JSON-LD Working Group <public-json-ld-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BN7PR06MB5154A6F227F9B9863C0D7020B2120@BN7PR06MB5154.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Thank you to everyone who came today--despite the late agenda! Next week, I would like us to revisit issue #329 - "Suggestion about `@prefix`" https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/329 In our discussion today, it was felt that there was no non-normative way to address the situation described there. Various options were proposed at both the syntax level and the API level, but all of them would require normative changes... Our next call is February 28th and we'll hopefully have Ivan and Rob on hand to help us navigate our options with regard to (potentially) making such a normative change--and (yes) bumping back CR again...which may in turn require the extension of the group. Please plan to come next Friday to discuss both issue #329 specifically as well as the practicalities of the CR process and our opportunities (or lack of them) to address this (and other similar) issues which may require normative changes to one or more of the specs. tl;dr Ivan, we'll be glad to have you back. ;) Thanks, all, and talk more next week! Benjamin Co-Chair, W3C JSON-LD WG -- http://bigbluehat.com/ http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung
Received on Friday, 21 February 2020 18:10:51 UTC