Re: [Agenda] JSON-LD Teleconference 2020-04-24

We should have a brief discussion on how to handle incoming issues which are deferred. Do we need to keep errata somewhere, or is it sufficient to just keep them deferred without mention in the PR/REC documents until we address them in an update?

Gregg Kellogg
gregg@greggkellogg.net

> On Apr 23, 2020, at 3:00 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> Our call is tomorrow, at the regular time of 9am Pacific, noon Eastern, 5pm UK, 6pm Europe.
> Call in details are here: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-json-ld-wg/2020Mar/0000.html <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-json-ld-wg/2020Mar/0000.html>
> Minutes from last week: https://www.w3.org/2018/json-ld-wg/Meetings/Minutes/2020/2020-04-17-json-ld <https://www.w3.org/2018/json-ld-wg/Meetings/Minutes/2020/2020-04-17-json-ld>
> 
> Agenda:
> * Scribe Selection
> * Announcements / Reminders?
> * Transitions:
>   * Streaming is Approved (by PLH)
>        https://github.com/w3c/transitions/issues/240 <https://github.com/w3c/transitions/issues/240>
>       * Namespace PR can proceed
>   *  Core specs not yet approved (by Ralph)
> * Rechartering check-in
> * Base Context
>    * Single doc, with aliases, prefixes and a few common terms
>       https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-rc/pull/8 <https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-rc/pull/8>
> * Any other progress?
> * Any other business?
> * Adjourn
> 
> Rob
> 
> -- 
> Rob Sanderson
> Semantic Architect
> The Getty Trust
> Los Angeles, CA 90049