Re: Draft OGC JSON Best Practice

> On Apr 16, 2019, at 2:09 AM, Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@univ-lyon1.fr> wrote:
> 
> I had a look at this section in particular.
> 
> * "[The JSON-LD documentation] is difficult to understand from the point of view of a JSON and XML user"
> 
>   ouch!

Well, this is why we need a Primer! Still, perhaps some specific feedback from them on how the spec could be improved to make it more understandable.

> * "a class name (a.k.a. data type)"
> 
>   This bothers me for 2 reasons:
>   - calling them "data types" may create confusion with literal datatypes;
>   - what is being given a type is not the data,
>     it is the *real-world object* described by the data.
> 
>   In both cases, I'm not entirely sure whether it requires fixing,
>   or it is just purist nitpicking…

+1 We could give them some feedback on this, so as not to further confuse the issue.

> * "lists of lists are not allowed in JSON-LD"
> 
>   This is true of JSON-LD 1.0, but was fixed in JSON-LD 1.1.
>   Should be suggest that they say "JSON-LD 1.0",  and possibly mention the fix in "JSON-LD 1.1"?
>   Or even possibly suggest that the move to JSON-LD 1.1, even if they publish before us,
>   just like VC and WoT are about to do?

+1 They might do exactly what VC is going to do.

Gregg

> On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 22:29, ajs6f <ajs6f@apache.org <mailto:ajs6f@apache.org>> wrote:
> The JSON-LD-specific section of this rather large document seems to be at:
> 
> https://github.com/opengeospatial/architecture-dwg/blob/master/json-best-practice/clause_7-from_json_to_jsonld.adoc <https://github.com/opengeospatial/architecture-dwg/blob/master/json-best-practice/clause_7-from_json_to_jsonld.adoc>
> 
> ajs6f
> 
> > On Apr 10, 2019, at 2:17 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net <mailto:gregg@greggkellogg.net>> wrote:
> > 
> > I forwarded this request on before; it should be discussed on the next call.
> > 
> > Gregg Kellogg
> > gregg@greggkellogg.net <mailto:gregg@greggkellogg.net>
> > 
> >> Begin forwarded message:
> >> 
> >> From: Gobe Hobona <ghobona@opengeospatial.org <mailto:ghobona@opengeospatial.org>>
> >> Subject: Draft OGC JSON Best Practice
> >> Date: March 7, 2019 at 12:14:38 AM PST
> >> To: gregg@greggkellogg.net <mailto:gregg@greggkellogg.net>
> >> Cc: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl <mailto:l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>>, Joan Masó Pau <joan.maso@uab.cat <mailto:joan.maso@uab.cat>>
> >> 
> >> Dear Gregg,
> >> 
> >> The Architecture Domain Working Group of the the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) has been working on a JSON Best Practice for the geospatial community. The document is still in draft form but we would appreciate it if you could please share the link with the W3C JSON-LD community group. Any feedback is welcome.
> >> 
> >> https://github.com/opengeospatial/architecture-dwg/tree/master/json-best-practice <https://github.com/opengeospatial/architecture-dwg/tree/master/json-best-practice>
> >> 
> >> I have copied in Joan Maso, the chair of the Architecture Domain Working Group and editor of the draft OGC JSON Best Practice.
> >> 
> >> I have also copied in Linda van den Brink (Geonovum), the chair of the OGC-W3C Spatial Data on the Web Interest Group https://www.w3.org/2017/sdwig/ <https://www.w3.org/2017/sdwig/>
> >> 
> >> Regards,
> >> 
> >> Gobe
> >> 
> >> __________________________________________
> >> 
> >> Dr. Gobe Hobona, PhD MRICS
> >> Director, Knowledge Management
> >> Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC)
> >> OGC: Making location count.
> >> 
> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/gobehobona <http://www.linkedin.com/in/gobehobona>
> >> Tel: +44 744 409 6781
> >> e-mail: ghobona@opengeospatial.org <mailto:ghobona@opengeospatial.org>
> >> www.opengeospatial.org <http://www.opengeospatial.org/>
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> > 
> 
>