- From: Benjamin Young <byoung@bigbluehat.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 15:33:42 +0000
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: W3C JSON-LD Working Group <public-json-ld-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <DM5PR06MB27788DD721E9917FC9FD901EB2CE0@DM5PR06MB2778.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Agreed. Consequently, I'm going to send out a cancellation notice--due to limited quorum and time for all of us to post-process TPAC related content. We'll reconvene next week at the usual time and day. Thanks, all! Benjamin Co-Chair, JSON-LD WG -- http://bigbluehat.com/ http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung ________________________________ From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2018 10:36 AM To: Benjamin Young Cc: W3C JSON-LD Working Group Subject: Re: Early regrets I am not sure we can really do too much. I for myself have nothing really to say on api-14, for example; I am not really familiar with the API. syntax-86 would require us to come up with a syntax proposal before doing anything and that is best done offline. I am not sure about 19 and 87 Ivan On 1 Nov 2018, at 14:52, Benjamin Young <byoung@bigbluehat.com<mailto:byoung@bigbluehat.com>> wrote: Well... That gives us 4 confirmed: Ivan, Adam, David, and myself. Consequently, if we meet, I'd recommend we do low-grade, non-voting activities like (possibly) discuss the Primer [1] and Best Practices [2] docs and/or analyze available calendars for a 2019 spring F2F. Here's the handful of issues I'd planned on us discussing (based on our project flow [3]): #14 Circular imports: Abort, Retry, Fail? https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/issues/14 #19 Indexing without a predicate https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/19 #86 Can Sub-Resource Integrity (SRI) be used in JSON-LD and for which use cases? https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/86 #87 Add ability to restrict overriding of terms with graph containers https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/87 At this point, I'm trying to gauge if our non-quorum "guaranteed" 4-person group is sufficient to make progress on any of these--given that we should probably avoid closing things with just 4 people... Thoughts? [1] https://json-ld.org/primer/latest/ [2] https://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld-api-best-practices/ [3] https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/4 -- http://bigbluehat.com/ http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung ________________________________ From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org<mailto:ivan@w3.org>> Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2018 1:32 AM To: Benjamin Young Cc: Gregg Kellogg; W3C JSON-LD Working Group Subject: Re: Early regrets I am around Ivan On 31 Oct 2018, at 21:28, Benjamin Young <byoung@bigbluehat.com<mailto:byoung@bigbluehat.com>> wrote: I've also got early regrets from Rob...which leaves very few of us on hand for Friday's meeting. If you're reading this, please respond with your availability this Friday at 12:00 Eastern. Thanks! Benjamin Co-Chair, JSON-LD WG -- http://bigbluehat.com/ http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung ________________________________ From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.com<mailto:gregg@greggkellogg.com>> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 11:12 AM To: public-json-ld-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-json-ld-wg@w3.org> Subject: Early regrets In advance of an agenda, I need to give regrets for Friday’s WG meeting, I’ll be traveling at that time. Gregg Kellogg Sent from my iPad ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Publishing@W3C Technical Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Publishing@W3C Technical Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
Received on Thursday, 1 November 2018 15:34:08 UTC