- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 00:32:31 +0200
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: public-json-ld-wg@w3.org
Received on Sunday, 24 June 2018 22:33:06 UTC
On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 at 22:30, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > On 06/23/2018 02:59 AM, Dan Brickley wrote: > > I would imagine it is best to avoid confusing things by talking > > about 1.1 or 2.0 in these early conversations. > > Agreed. In fact, not talking about 2.0 until we really know what it is > would be best. We don't want to scare developers thinking that they're > building on top of something (JSON-LD 1.0) that may change in the next > year. We don't want to do something that is going to harm the velocity > of adoption. > Well said. That's pretty much where we were coming from in Google's initial objection to this WG's charter as first drafted. There's a lot of adoption to celebrate and build on, and "oh, there's a new version imminent" could easily take energy out of new implementation work if presented carelessly. Dan > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Veres One Decentralized Identifier Blockchain Launches > https://tinyurl.com/veres-one-launches > >
Received on Sunday, 24 June 2018 22:33:06 UTC