Re: Next steps for Simple Ruby

Hello Richard,

> I'd like to get this doc out as soon as possible.  Would it be acceptable to do the last jlreq review at the same time as the wide review?


Yes. The document has been reviewed by the TF and the consensus was that it can be brought up to the Fist Public Working Draft, and further improvements can be done on top of the FPWD. I believe the situation has not changed, only that the translation became more natural (thank you!).

Also, if anything from the TF we can fix them in the step 4.

> Note that since this is a WG Note, we can publish updates to it at any time.  So i propose that issues such as that raised (in email) by Nat be discussed with a view to updating the Note.  I think the most important thing is to get the useful information we already do have out there as soon as possible.
> 
> What do you think?

Sounds like a good plan.

best regards,

- kida

> 2020/06/03 21:05、r12a <ishida@w3.org>のメール:
> 
> 
> Kida-san, 
> 
> I'd like to get this doc out as soon as possible.  Would it be acceptable to do the last jlreq review at the same time as the wide review?
> 
> If so, i think the next steps would look like this:
> 
> 1. agree with the i18n WG tomorrow to publish this as a FPWD and send out a request for wide review.
> 
> 2. publish FPWD next Tuesday and announce for review
> 
> 3. wait one week for comments.
> 
> 4. fix comments, as necessary, then get the agreement from jlreq and i18n WG to publish as a Note.
> 
> 5. publish as WG Note.
> 
> 
> Note that since this is a WG Note, we can publish updates to it at any time.  So i propose that issues such as that raised (in email) by Nat be discussed with a view to updating the Note.  I think the most important thing is to get the useful information we already do have out there as soon as possible.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> ri
>