What is the internal review process going to be, if any, prior to submitting to the i18n wg?
--Nat
On 1/29/19, 3:09 AM, "Florian Rivoal" <florian@rivoal.net> wrote:
Hi,
Right. I have a small update to do to the translation, and after that I can submit it to the jlreq TF. What's the best format for you? Raw HTML? Bikeshed? Do you plan to publish it as a WG/IG-Note, or some other format/styling?
Let me know how I should prepare it, and I'll get it ready soonish.
—Florian
> On Jan 29, 2019, at 18:11, Yasuo Kida <kida@mac.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> Yes, Florian is working on the ruby document and I believe it can be finished relatively soon.
> Florian, could you update?
>
> Thanks,
>
> - kida
>
>> 2019/01/29 1:53、r12a <ishida@w3.org>のメール:
>>
>> Florian, Kida-san,
>>
>> One of the objectives of the newly constituted jlreq TF is to publish documents supporting or extending the JLReq Note.
>>
>> We had talked about publishing some documents produced by the Advanced Publishing Lab - in particular we mentioned last year "Rules for Simple Placement of Ruby".
>>
>> Is there any update on the status of such documents?
>>
>> cheers,
>> ri
>>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2019 18:17:32 UTC