- From: Alan Painter <alan.painter@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 16:48:47 +0200
- To: John Lumley <john@saxonica.com>
- Cc: public-ixml@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2026 14:49:03 UTC
Just one more link confirming the "PEG"iness of JSONPATH in Glyn Normington's RFC release post. https://www.ietf.org/blog/jsonpath-rfc/ "Given that the WG tried to keep the ABNF “PEG-compatible” by ordering > choices suitably, the parser is highly likely to match the spec. This may > be a more promising approach for a Reference Implementation than manually > comparing a hand-coded PEG to the ABNF. " On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 4:36 PM Alan Painter <alan.painter@gmail.com> wrote: > Sending the link to the JSONPATH mailing list archive in which PEG is > mentioned as the "target" grammar for RFC9535. > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jsonpath/ogJWSy_12YYZmVRUNNdPlS3IJXk/ > > thanks for the discussion > > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 4:31 PM John Lumley <john@saxonica.com> wrote: > >> On 27/04/2026 11:43, Norm Tovey-Walsh wrote: >> >> Meeting: Invisible XML Community Group >> >> Minutes of the meeting are now available at >> https://www.w3.org/2026/04/28-ixml-minutes.html >> -- >> *John Lumley* MA PhD CEng FIEE >> john@saxonica.com >> >
Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2026 14:49:03 UTC