Re: iXML Agenda, 4 February 2025 (proposed amendment)

But your performance trick reads the input twice, right?


Steven



On Tuesday 04 February 2025 15:07:02 (+01:00), Fredrik Öhrström wrote:


> Was "serialising ambiguity" one of them? Because we should allocate some time to that sometime as well.


Yes, a brief discussion of the serialising ambiguity would be nice. 


I described the performance trick used by xmq to parse quickly using bitsets, was described
in my email about ambiguity, so we no longer need to use meeting time for that.



//Fredrik



Den tis 4 feb. 2025 kl 13:52 skrev Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl <mailto:steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> >:


Was "serialising ambiguity" one of them? Because we should allocate some time to that sometime as well.

Steven

On Tuesday 04 February 2025 13:47:38 (+01:00), Norm Tovey-Walsh wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> Last time we met, we said we’d allocation some time for Fredrik to discuss a couple of things, but I failed to put it on the agenda. (Apologies Fredrik.)
>
> If Fredrik is ready, I propose we allocate some time after status reports.
>
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
>
> --
> Norm Tovey-Walsh
> Saxonica
>
>