- From: Fredrik Öhrström <oehrstroem@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 15:07:02 +0100
- To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Cc: public-ixml@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2025 14:07:33 UTC
> Was "serialising ambiguity" one of them? Because we should allocate some time to that sometime as well. Yes, a brief discussion of the serialising ambiguity would be nice. I described the performance trick used by xmq to parse quickly using bitsets, was described in my email about ambiguity, so we no longer need to use meeting time for that. //Fredrik Den tis 4 feb. 2025 kl 13:52 skrev Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl >: > > Was "serialising ambiguity" one of them? Because we should allocate some > time to that sometime as well. > > Steven > > On Tuesday 04 February 2025 13:47:38 (+01:00), Norm Tovey-Walsh wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > Last time we met, we said we’d allocation some time for Fredrik to > discuss a couple of things, but I failed to put it on the agenda. > (Apologies Fredrik.) > > > > If Fredrik is ready, I propose we allocate some time after status > reports. > > > > Be seeing you, > > norm > > > > -- > > Norm Tovey-Walsh > > Saxonica > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2025 14:07:33 UTC