Re: iXML Agenda, 4 February 2025 (proposed amendment)

> Was "serialising ambiguity" one of them? Because we should allocate some
time to that sometime as well.

Yes, a brief discussion of the serialising ambiguity would be nice.

I described the performance trick used by xmq to parse quickly using
bitsets, was described
in my email about ambiguity, so we no longer need to use meeting time for
that.

//Fredrik

Den tis 4 feb. 2025 kl 13:52 skrev Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl
>:

>
> Was "serialising ambiguity" one of them? Because we should allocate some
> time to that sometime as well.
>
> Steven
>
> On Tuesday 04 February 2025 13:47:38 (+01:00), Norm Tovey-Walsh wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Last time we met, we said we’d allocation some time for Fredrik to
> discuss a couple of things, but I failed to put it on the agenda.
> (Apologies Fredrik.)
> >
> > If Fredrik is ready, I propose we allocate some time after status
> reports.
> >
> >                                         Be seeing you,
> >                                           norm
> >
> > --
> > Norm Tovey-Walsh
> > Saxonica
> >
> >
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2025 14:07:33 UTC